P. v. Shamim
Defendant Mohammed Shamim was convicted following a jury trial of two felonies and five misdemeanors in connection with his involvement in a fight that started in a shopping mall after he hit a teenaged girl in the face. On appeal, he challenges his conviction for misdemeanor vandalism (which was originally charged as a felony). (Pen. Code, 594.) Court conclude that vandalism is a general intent crime, and that defendants conviction was supported by sufficient evidence. Defendant also claims that the trial court erred when it imposed a probation supervision fee without determining his ability to pay the fee. Court affirm the judgment, but order the trial court to correct a clerical error in its minute order with respect to the fee.
Comments on P. v. Shamim