In re X.C.
Consuelo G. appeals from an order terminating her parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to her son, X.[1] Appellant contends the court erred by rejecting her claim that termination would be detrimental to X. based on their parent/child relationship. On review, Court disagree and affirm.

Comments on In re X.C.

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced