In re T.W.
Appellants C.C. (Mother) and D.W. (Father) are the parents of a girl (Daughter), born in March 2000, and a boy (Son), born in April 2005. The parents appeal the juvenile courts orders terminating parental rights and placing the children for adoption. (Welf & Inst. Code, 366.26.) Mother also appeals the courts denial of her petition to modify a previous order terminating her reunification services and limiting her visits with the children to once per month, supervised. ( 388.) Mother claims the juvenile court erred in summarily denying her section 388 petition, and that insufficient evidence supports the courts finding that the parental benefit exception to the adoption preference did not apply to her relationships with the children. ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A).) Mother also joins Fathers claims to the extent they may benefit her. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.200(a)(5).) Court disagree with Father, Mother, and the minors counsel that the matter must be remanded with directions to comply with the notice requirements of the ICWA. As we explain, it is not reasonably probable that any of the complained of deficiencies in the ICWA notices affected any tribes ability to determine whether the children were Indian children. We also find the parents other claims without merit, and affirm the orders.
Comments on In re T.W.