P. v. Woodard
Defendant Charles Ray Woodard challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for armed robbery and claims judicial error in the trial courts order denying his Marsden motion. Court find no error and affirm.
P. v. Woodard
Defendant Charles Ray Woodard challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for armed robbery and claims judicial error in the trial courts order denying his Marsden motion. Court find no error and affirm.
Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.
Comments on P. v. Woodard