In re J.L.
In this appeal, defendant and appellant Maria L. (mother) challenges the juvenile courts decision to terminate her parental rights to her four children under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Specifically, mother argues that the court erred when it found that the parental bond exception ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A)) to the presumption for adoption did not apply. As discussed below, we find that substantial evidence supports the juvenile courts finding, and so affirm the orders terminating parental rights and selecting adoption as the permanent plan. The juvenile courts orders terminating mothers parental rights and selecting adoption as the childrens permanent plan are affirmed.
Comments on In re J.L.