Akintimoye v. CalPERS
Samuel A. Akintimoye (Akintimoye) appeals from the judgment denying a petition for a writ of administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., 1094.5) directed at the California Public Employees Retirement System Board of Administration (the Board). On appeal, he raises the following issues: (1) Whether any action or failure to act by the Board regarding an alleged improper ex parte communication between California Public Employees Retirement Systems (CalPERS) counsel and the Administrative Law Judge Greer Knopf prior to the issuance of her decision in this case violated his due process rights; and (2) Whether the decision of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence.
The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on Akintimoye v. CalPERS