Batterton v. Campana
In this case alleging breach of a contract for the sale of a commercial ground lease, the seller--plaintiff/cross-defendant Carl Batterton--appeals from a judgment and post-judgment orders in favor of defendants/cross-complainants Victor J. Campana and Anthony Campos, following a trial and special jury verdict finding that plaintiff and defendants entered a contract, but plaintiff as the seller did not perform, and therefore defendants were not required to perform. Plaintiff contends the jury was erroneously asked to make a finding of law by interpreting the contract, and their legal conclusion was wrong. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Batterton v. Campana