P. v. Pope
At his preliminary hearing, appellant brought a motion to suppress all evidence seized during a warrantless search of his home. After the magistrate denied the motion, appellant renewed it in superior court, where it was again denied after the court found appellant had voluntarily consented to the search, and that his consent was sufficiently attenuated from any taint of an earlier illegal sweep of the residence. Appellant contends the court should have found from the totality of the circumstances that his consent was involuntary. Court find substantial evidence to support the trial courts finding, and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Pope