In re M.G.
Jose G. and his five-year-old son, M. G., separately appeal from the jurisdiction and disposition orders of the juvenile court finding true that Jose sexually abused M. and that M.s parents had a violent confrontation in the childs presence. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 300, subd. (d).)[1]Both appellants contend that the court erred in relying on M.s out-of-court statements to sustain the petition and there was insufficient evidence to justify the removal of M. from Joses custody ( 361, subd. (c)). Guided by our Supreme Court in In re Cindy L. (1997) 17 Cal.4th 15 (Cindy L.) and In re Lucero L. (2000) 22 Cal.4th 1227 (Lucero L.), Court affirm the orders.
Comments on In re M.G.