P. v. Coleman
Appellant claims ineffective assistance of counsel, because defense counsel did not call or interview a witness who had initially given potentially exonerating statements to the police, but later admitted having lied, and then entered a factual-basis plea, testifying adversely to appellant. Appellant also contends there was no substantial evidence to support a finding that his prior conviction was a serious felony requiring increased punishment as a second strike. Court reject both contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Coleman