P. v. Carrizales
A jury convicted appellant of three counts of oral copulation with a person under the age of 18. The court imposed the two year midterm on count 2 and concurrent two year terms on each of counts 3 and 4.
On appeal, appellant contends the court erred prejudicially in (1) admitting evidence appellant committed two uncharged sex offenses, and (2) failing to define "preponderance of the evidence" in instructing the jury on the evaluation of that evidence. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Carrizales