legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Laidley v. City of Belvedere
Appellants Wendell and Claire Laidley (petitioners in the trial court) seek reversal of a judgment in favor of Respondents City of Belvedere et al. (City). The trial court denied appellants petition for writ of administrative mandamus and prayer for declaratory relief challenging the constitutionality of a City ordinance, Belvedere Municipal Code (BMC) Title 20, Architectural and Environmental Design Review, chapter 20.04 Design Review, section 20.04.035 Time Limits for Construction.[1] The City imposed a cumulative penalty of $100,000 on appellants for failure to complete a building project within the time frame specified under the conditions of the building permit. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale