legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. King
Michael King appeals from an order denying his release from commitment. In 1992, appellant was found not guilty of a charge of murder by reason of insanity and committed to the state hospital. On August 31, 2006, appellant filed an in pro per application for restoration of sanity pursuant to Penal Code, section 1026.2.[1] On February 1, 2007, the trial court conducted a bench trial and denied the application. On February 6, 2007, appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.
Court appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Court have examined the entire record and are satisfied that defendants appellate attorneys have fully complied with their responsibilities and that no arguable issues favorable to him exist. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 279 280; People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at pp. 441, 443.) The order is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale