P. v. Tinker
Defendant Andrew Tinker was found guilty by a jury of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, 496, subd. (a)),[1]driving without a valid license (Veh. Code, 12500, subd. (a)) and driving on a suspended license (Veh. Code, 14601.1, subd. (a)). On appeal, he contends the trial court committed instructional error and failed to adequately respond to the jurys request for clarification of jury instructions. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Tinker