Ariel Y. v. Super. Ct
Petitioners seek relief from juvenile court orders terminating reunification services and setting a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1]to select a permanent plan for the 19-month-old child, Ariel B. The mother, Ariel Y., argues the child should be returned to her because there was insufficient evidence of continued risk. Both the mother and the father, Jesus B., assert they were not offered reasonable services. Court find these contentions to be without merit and deny the petition.
Comments on Ariel Y. v. Super. Ct