legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Chavarria
A jury convicted defendant Francisco Galvan Chavarria of rape of an incapacitated person (Pen. Code, 261, subd. (a)(3)),[1]sexual battery ( 243.4, subd. (e)(1)), residential burglary ( 459, 460), and petty theft. Defendant was sentenced to state prison for seven years four months. On appeal, defendant contends (1) his conviction of sexual battery must be reversed and dismissed because it is a necessarily included offense of rape of an incapacitated person; (2) if sexual battery is not a necessarily included offense of rape of an incapacitated person, the sentence imposed for the battery must be stayed pursuant to section 654; (3) the evidence was insufficient to support the burglary and petty theft convictions; (4) if the evidence is sufficient to support the burglary and petty theft convictions, the concurrent term for the petty theft must be stayed pursuant to section 654; (5) prosecutorial misconduct requires reversal of all convictions; and (6) imposition of consecutive terms violated his right to a jury trial and proof beyond a reasonable doubt as set forth in Blakely v. Washington (2005) 542 U.S. 296 [159 L.Ed.2d 403]. With the exception of defendants second and fourth contentions, which we conclude have merit, we reject his other claims. Accordingly, pursuant to section 654, Court stay the sentences imposed for the sexual battery and petty theft convictions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale