P. v. Saenthavysouk
A jury convicted defendant of assault with a deadly weapon, to wit, a bottle. (Pen. Code, 245, subd. (a)(1).) In bifurcated proceedings, the court found a strike prior (Pen. Code, 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12) and a prior serious felony (Pen. Code, 667, subd. (a)(1)) to be true.
The court sentenced defendant to state prison for an aggregate term of 11 years, that is, the midterm of three years for the assault offense, doubled for the strike prior, plus a five-year enhancement for the prior felony.
Defendant appeals.
Court appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Saenthavysouk