Huang v. Nguyen
Defendant and appellant Ted Nguyen filed an unsuccessful anti-SLAPP motion (Code Civ. Proc., 425.16). He did not seek appellate review. One year later, he filed a second anti-SLAPP motion in the same action, purportedly based on new law, under the authority of Code of Civil Procedure section 1008, subdivision (b). The motion was denied, on the basis that the new authority on which Nguyen relied was distinguishable. Nguyen now appeals, attempting to challenge on appeal not only the denial of his motion for reconsideration, but also the initial denial of his anti-SLAPP motion. Court conclude that only the denial of the motion for reconsideration is before us, and that the trial court did not err in denying that motion. Court affirm.
Comments on Huang v. Nguyen