In re W.M.
Danielle F. (hereafter mother) appeals from the trial courts order under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26[1]terminating her parental rights to four of her five children. Mother contends that the beneficial relationship and the sibling relationship exceptions to parental rights termination apply in this case. In addition, mother challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial courts finding that the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.) does not apply in this case. Court agree with mothers ICWA claim and therefore conditionally reverse the judgment.
Comments on In re W.M.