P. v. McMillan
Defendant and appellant William Israel McMillan appeals after he was convicted of assault upon Armond Hagan. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in excluding evidence that a third party may have committed the crime. He also contends that he was improperly sentenced to the aggravated term in violation of his right to a trial by jury under Cunningham v. California (2006) 546 U.S. 1169 [126 S.Ct. 1329, 164 L.Ed.2d 47] (Cunningham) and Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 [124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403]. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. McMillan