P. v. Urbina
Appellant was convicted of assaulting an elder in a fast food restaurant, and of vandalizing the restaurants property. On appeal, she contends that the prosecutor committed misconduct in his closing argument; that her trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object to some of the prosecutors arguments and by failing to request a pinpoint jury instruction; and that the trial judge erred in denying her motion to strike her prior strike. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Urbina