P. v. White
Appellant Keith L. White appeals from his conviction on charges of forcible rape, forcible oral copulation by future threats, and robbery. In his original appeal, he contended that the evidence was insufficient to support the charge of oral copulation through threat of future injury. We sent a letter to counsel asking them to address whether the 1998 changes in Penal Code section 288a,[1]which separated the various methods of committing forcible oral copulation into different subdivisions, were intended by the Legislature to be technical and not substantive. While the appeal was pending, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 (Blakely). Accordingly, we granted leave to file supplemental briefing on sentencing issues raised by Blakely. In August 2005, appellant sought, and we granted permission, to file additional supplemental briefing seeking review of purported nunc pro tunc orders issued by the trial court after notice of appeal was filed. The effect of the orders was to substantially increase appellants sentence on the robbery charge by increasing the enhancement. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. White