legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Burke
This appeal comes before us following defendants entry of a negotiated plea of guilty to a charge of grand theft (Pen. Code, 487, subd. (a)),[1] and his admission of an associated enhancement for excessive taking ( 12022.6, subd. (a)(1)). His counsel has raised no issues and asks this court to conduct an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any issues that would, if resolved favorably to defendant, result in reversal or modification of the judgment. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant has been advised by counsel that he has the right to file a supplemental brief raising issues for our review. He has not done so. Upon independent review of the record, Court conclude that no arguable issues are presented for review, and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale