P. v. Tucker
Defendant Gerald Tucker is before this court for the third time in this case after we remanded his case for further proceedings on two previous occasions. He claims the trial court abused its discretion when it failed to strike his prior convictions under the Three Strikes Law. In addition, he argues that a consecutive sentence could not be imposed because his murder conviction, arising from a 1969 murder, merges with his other sentences. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Tucker