legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Simmons
Defendant James Henry Simmons appeals from his convictions for two counts of forcible oral copulation (Pen. Code, 288a, subd. (c)(2)) and one count of oral copulation with a person under 18 years of age ( 288a, subd. (b)(1)). He contends the trial court erred in summarily dismissing his request to disclose juror identifying information, the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a new trial, and the trial courts delivery of the CALJIC instruction on reasonable doubt rather than the CALCRIM instruction resulted in structural error. Court are not persuaded by defendants claims and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale