Dilbeck v. Van Schaick
Appellants Jeffrey and Barbara Van Schaick appeal the order denying their special motion to strike the complaint of respondents Mark and Teresa Dilbeck. They contend the trial court erred in ruling that the Dilbecks action was not a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP). Court conclude the Dilbecks complaint does not arise from acts undertaken in furtherance of the Van Schaicks rights of free speech or petition, and therefore, affirm.
Comments on Dilbeck v. Van Schaick