P. v. King
Anthony King was convicted of six counts of second degree robbery involving the personal use of a firearm (Pen. Code,[1] 211, 12022.53, subd. (b)) and two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm ( 12021, subd. (a)(1).) On appeal, he argues that insufficient evidence supports the robbery convictions and that fingerprint evidence should have been suppressed. The Attorney General argues that the matter should be remanded for resentencing because the trial court failed to impose all mandatory sentence enhancements. Court affirm the convictions and remand with directions to the trial court to impose an additional five year sentence enhancement under section 667, subdivision (a)(1).
Comments on P. v. King