Shaffer v. Wallace
Gene Shaffer appeals from the judgment entered against him on his complaint for partition and an accounting against Otis Wallace and Gonzalo Posada and in favor of Wallace on Wallaces cross-complaint for partition and damages. Shaffer contends the trial courts equitable rulings on the partition and accounting causes of action were premised on a finding of fraud for which there was insufficient evidence. He also argues the court erred in allowing Wallace to amend his cross complaint to conform to proof at trial and awarded inconsistent and unauthorized remedies to Wallace and Posada. Finally, he contends the award of expert costs was improper. With the exception of the award of costs, Court affirm.
Comments on Shaffer v. Wallace