P. v. Wolf
Defendant Jeffery Martin Wolf appeals from a judgment entered following his guilty plea to, among other things, one count of assault with a deadly weapon. He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to Penal Code section 1018.[1] He argues that his plea was defective because he was not advised that under section 1203, subdivision (e), his admission of the aggravated assault created a statutory presumption against probation. Court conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion because, when his plea was accepted, there was not a climate of real anticipation that probation was likely. (People v. Vento (1989) 208 Cal.App.3d 876, 879 (Vento).)
Comments on P. v. Wolf