P. v. Thoreson
Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant Martin Adrian Thoreson was convicted of offenses involving possession of depictions of juvenile sexual conduct. He contends that a $400 restitution fine violated the terms of the plea bargain, and that he is entitled to two more days conduct credit than the trial court allowed. Respondent concedes the second contention. When the matter was first before us we rejected the challenge to the restitution fine while recognizing that a related issue was before the California Supreme Court. That court granted review in this matter and has now transferred it to us for reconsideration in light of the relevant case, People v. Crandell (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1301 (Crandell). Court have concluded that our previous disposition was entirely consistent with Crandell, and therefore again affirm the judgment as modified to correct the conceded error with respect to sentence credits
Comments on P. v. Thoreson