legal news


Register | Forgot Password

THE PEOPLE v. HUE NAY
Defendant Hue Nay shot a teenage boy in the hand and was convicted of assault with a firearm, being a felon in possession of a firearm, and being an active participant in a criminal street gang. He received a prison sentence of 24 years, which included sentence enhancements for personal firearm use and committing the assault for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with a criminal street gang. On appeal, he argues that (1) there was insufficient evidence to prove the substantive charge of active gang participation; (2) there was insufficient evidence to prove the gang enhancement; (3) a portion of the testimony of the prosecutions gang expert was admitted into evidence erroneously and was an improper basis for his opinion; and (4) the sentence contravened the United States Supreme Courts recent decisions in Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296 (Blakely) and Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. [127 S.Ct. 856] (Cunningham). Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale