legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Rankin
A jury convicted defendant Sonya Deniece Rankin of two counts of conspiracy (Pen. Code, 182, subd. (a)(1));[1] 10 counts of grand theft ( 487, subd. (a)); and one count of possession of stolen property ( 496). The jury found that the loss was over $150,000 within the meaning of section 12022.6, subdivisions (a)(2) and (b), and over $100,000 within the meaning of section 1203.045, subdivision (a). The jury further found that the crimes involved a pattern of fraudulent conduct and a taking of over $500,000 ( 186.11, subds. (a)(1), (2)), and that defendant was out on bail when she committed four of the crimes ( 12022.1).
Defendants upper term and consecutive sentences are appropriate. Defendants argument that Sandoval invalidates jury determined aggravating circumstances is moot. The judgment and sentence are affirmed.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale