legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.C.
In these appeals from the order terminating their parental rights to L.C., appellants Dan C. (father) and Michelle M. (mother) raise issues concerning compliance with the notice provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.) As well, they challenge the juvenile courts adoptability finding, assert that the beneficial exception to adoption applied but was not invoked, and argue that mothers Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition should have been granted. The Humboldt County Department of Health and Human Services (Department) concedes that a limited reversal is required because ICWA notice documents were not filed with the juvenile court. Because Court cannot make a complete assessment of the adequacy of notice due to this deficiency, a limited reversal and remand is in order. In all other respects Court affirm the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale