P. v. Padilla
Appellant Rudy Rodolfo Padilla challenges his second degree murder conviction on the grounds that, apart from appellants admissions, the evidence was insufficient to establish the corpus delicti, the trial court erred by admitting a videotape and transcript, instructing the jury upon flight, and staying, instead of striking, two Penal Code section 12022.53 enhancements. We conclude the corpus delicti was adequately established. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the edited videotape or transcript. The court properly instructed upon flight and stayed superfluous Penal Code section 12022.53 enhancements. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Padilla