P. v. Elam
Defendant and appellant Kau Ashanita Elam appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial that resulted in his convictions for assault on a peace officer and resisting executive officers. Elam was sentenced to a term of six years in prison. He contends the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion for release of juror identification information; (2) imposing the upper term sentence based on facts neither admitted by appellant nor found by a jury (Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296); and (3) imposing sentence on numerous counts in violation of Penal Code section 654. Elam also requests that we review the sealed transcript of the in camera Pitchess hearing to determine whether the trial court erred by finding only one discoverable document. The People request that the abstract of judgment be corrected. Court find the abstract of judgment reflects the correct judgment. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Elam