Marriage of Vanneman and K
Appellant Donald Kinzel returns to this court for a second review of an attorney fees award made more than 13 years ago in favor of his former wife, respondent Pamela Vanneman. On this occasion he contends that the order, which sanctioned him under Family Code section 271 for improper litigation conduct, was void, as it characterized the award as additional child support. Appellant's new argument fails.
Comments on Marriage of Vanneman and K