Freestyle Martial Arts Corp. v. Soco, LLC.
Defendants Soco, LLC (Soco), Rieker Shoe Corporation (Rieker), and America West Properties, Inc.,[1](AWP) appeal a judgment after the jury found them liable in the action of plaintiff Freestyle Martial Arts Corporation (Freestyle) for breach of contract (against Soco) and intentional inducement of breach of contract (against Rieker and AWP). On appeal, Rieker and AWP contend: (1) there is insufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that they are liable for intentional inducement of breach of contract; and (2) they are entitled to judgment because the manager's privilege applies to their conduct as a matter of law. Soco and Rieker contend the trial court erred by rejecting their request for an instruction on the propriety of their counsel's meeting with witnesses in the absence of Freestyle's counsel. All three defendants contend there is insufficient evidence to support the jury's finding on Freestyle's damages.
Comments on Freestyle Martial Arts Corp. v. Soco, LLC.