Triche-Winston v. Vassar
Plaintiffs Charel Winston and Alma M. Triche-Winston (collectively plaintiffs), appearing in pro. per., appeal from the denial of their petition for an injunction prohibiting harassment under Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6. They contend the trial court erred in (1) denying the petition; (2) failing to rule on all of the motions that were filed in connection with the petition; (3) denying their motion to strike defendants opposition to plaintiffs Response to Order to Show Cause for Civil Harassment Order; (4) failing to take in to [sic] account all of the facts in ruling on the petition; and (5) awarding defendants attorney fees. Plaintiffs also assert that their due process rights were violated because the political bias in the county made it impossible for the [trial] court to be impartial in its final ruling and the trial court was persuaded to deny plaintiffs petition because of the district attorneys malicious prosecution case against them. Mindful of our limited role in reviewing the issues raised by this appeal, Court affirm the judgment and the award of attorney fees.
Comments on Triche-Winston v. Vassar