In re S.K.
Tammy N. (mother) appeals from the orders denying her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388[1]for return of S. K. (Tino) and M. D. (Mark) to her custody and terminating parental rights under section 366.26 to Tino, Mark, and I. S. (Jay). Mother contends the denial of her section 388 petition was an abuse of discretion and notice of the proceedings was not given as required by the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (the ICWA) (92 Stat. 3069, 25 U.S.C. 1901-1963). Court affirm.
Comments on In re S.K.