legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re E.B.
Keith W. appeals from the April 3, 2007 orders denying his Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition and terminating his parental rights to E.B. He contends the court erred in finding: (1) he was neither E.B.s presumed father nor a Kelsey S. father,and therefore not entitled to reunification services; (2) no changed circumstances warranted granting his section 388 petition to modify the order denying him reunification services; and (3) the section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) exception did not apply. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale