SHELLER v. THE SUPERIOR COURT PART I
Where attorney appearing pro hac vice for plaintiffs in a class action sent a communication to prospective class members that contained at least one misrepresentation, trial court lacked authority to impose sanctions that it could not impose on a California attorney, such as attorney's fees or a formal reprimand, but had authority to revoke pro hac vice status if it found the misconduct to be sufficiently egregious.
Comments on SHELLER v. THE SUPERIOR COURT PART I