GOLDMAN v. SIMPSON
Where defendant who no longer resided in California moved to vacate renewal of money judgment in favor of plaintiff, arguing that he had insufficient contacts with California to confer personal jurisdiction, trial court properly denied motion filed more than 30 days after service of notice of renewal because it was untimely under Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 683.170, and because court had continuing jurisdiction, derived from its jurisdiction at time of original judgment, under Sec. 410.50 to enter renewal.
Comments on GOLDMAN v. SIMPSON