legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Paris S.
The minor Paris S. was found to be a dependent child of the court pursuant to section 300, subdivision (b) of the Welfare and Institutions Code (section 300(b)), based on a substantial risk that the child will suffer[] serious physical harm or illness, as a result of the failure or inability of his or her parent or guardian to adequately supervise or protect the child.[1] Paris was removed from the custody of her parents, Y. D. (Mother) and Kevin S. (Father), and suitably placed with a friend of the family. Mother and Father have appealed. They contend: (1) There was no substantial evidence to support the jurisdictional order. (2) There was no clear and convincing evidence to support the order removing Paris from their care, and it was an abuse of discretion to do so. (3) Some of the dispositional orders were erroneous.
Court reverse two of the dispositional orders, modify another, and otherwise affirm.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale