Cole v. Haymaker
Defendant and appellant Fredrica Haymaker appeals from an order denying her motion to set aside a default judgment entered in favor of Michelle Cole in this action concerning the sale of real property. Haymaker contends: (1) she was never served with the operative amended complaint, and therefore, the default and default judgment were void; and (2) the default and default judgment should be set aside on equitable grounds. Court hold that substantial evidence supports the trial courts findings and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its ruling, and therefore affirm the order.
Comments on Cole v. Haymaker