DeBlasis v. Cohen & Lord
Appellants Cohen & Lord and Bruce M. Cohen challenge a trial court order denying their request to arbitrate claims initiated by respondents Robert J. DeBlasis (DeBlasis) and Luigia A. Pizzo (Pizzo). Appellants argue that the trial court erred in finding that the parties arbitration agreement (1) did not cover all claims asserted by respondents, and (2) was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable.
Accordingly, Court reverse the trial courts order and remand the matter to the trial court with instructions to grant appellants motion and order this dispute to arbitration.
Comments on DeBlasis v. Cohen & Lord