P. v. Espinoza
Jose J. Espinoza appeals the judgment following his conviction for assault with a deadly weapon, an automobile. (Pen. Code, 245, subd. (a)(1).)[1] Espinoza claims he received ineffective assistance of counsel when defense counsel failed to object to misconduct by the prosecutor when the prosecutor misstated the reasonable doubt burden of proof during closing argument. court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Espinoza