In re C.C.
Laurie S. appeals from an order terminating her parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26) to her son C.C.[1] She contends the court erred when it denied her request for a continuance of the termination proceedings in order to file a section 388 modification request. She also claims respondent Merced County Human Services Agency (agency) supplied insufficient family information to enable Indian tribes to investigate and resolve whether C.C. was an Indian child for purposes of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.). On review, Court conditionally reverse the termination order for a limited remand related to ICWA compliance. Otherwise, we affirm.
Comments on In re C.C.