legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Hilton v. Bressler
Plaintiff and appellant Brenda Hilton brought suit against defendants and respondents Joe and Jean Bressler, seeking damages for injuries allegedly sustained from being bitten by the Bresslers dog. The trial jury delivered a unanimous verdict finding the Bresslers strictly liable[1] for Hiltons injuries and awarding Hilton damages equivalent to her past medical expenses. Hilton subsequently filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, a new trial. The trial court denied the motion. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale