Vinson v. SF Community College Dist.
Plaintiff Harold Vinson filed a complaint alleging that he had been harmed by an accusation made by defendant San Francisco Community College District (City College).[1] After the trial court sustained a demurrer premised, in part, on the vagueness of his complaint, Vinson clarified in an amended complaint that the false statement had been made during a proceeding in superior court. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the amended complaint without leave to amend on grounds, among others, that the claim was barred by the litigation privilege of Civil Code section 47, subdivision (b). After Vinson filed a pleading that the trial court construed as a motion for reconsideration and denied, Vinson appealed from the denial of the motion for reconsideration. Because we conclude that the motion for reconsideration is not an appealable order, Court dismiss the appeal.
Comments on Vinson v. SF Community College Dist.