P. v. Pequeno
Manuel Pequeno (appellant) appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of residential burglary (Pen. Code, 459[1]). He contends: (1) the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it could find him guilty of burglary based on evidence of intent to commit either a theft or a felony related to drug sales; (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel; (3) there was no substantial evidence supporting the conviction; (4) the trial court erred in not instructing the jury regarding the lesser-related crime of trespass; and (5) the prosecutors misconduct warrants reversal of the conviction. Court reject the contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Pequeno